Submit your monitoring methods here! We'll review and publish them to the repository to share with the community.
Motion-activated cameras enable Indigenous communities to document wildlife presence, behavior, and populations on Traditional territories, which supports self-determined conservation research.
Indigenous communities increasingly seek to answer their own questions about wildlife on Traditional territories. Camera traps provide non-invasive 24-hour monitoring complementing Traditional observation.
Methods: Trackers place motion-activated cameras at locations identified through Traditional Knowledge, including animal trails, water sources, feeding sites. Cameras automatically photograph passing wildlife. Communities analyze images to document species presence, behavior, and population patterns.
Results: Amazonian and other Indigenous communities successfully operate camera trap programs. Traditional Knowledge optimizes camera placement, detecting elusive species. Programs provide evidence for conservation advocacy, validate Traditional Knowledge, and support land rights claims through wildlife documentation.
Discussion/Conclusions: Camera traps demonstrate how Indigenous communities adopt scientific tools while maintaining research control. Combining tracker expertise with technology creates effective monitoring. Communities control research questions, methodologies, data ownership, and knowledge production for self-determined conservation.
Rare species detection
Behavioral studies
Population monitoring
Illegal activity detection
Conservation status assessment
Human-wildlife conflict documentation
Biodiversity inventory
Tools: Motion-activated camera traps with infrared, SD cards, batteries/solar panels, weatherproof cases, locks, GPS units.
Software: Wildlife Insights, Camera Base, Timelapse for image management. AI tools for species identification.
Personnel: Experienced trackers for camera placement, community members for image analysis, potentially wildlife biologist consultation. Adequate computer storage for large image databases.
Wildlife Insights platform (free, Google-supported). Camera Base software (open-source). Timelapse image analysis tool. Species identification guides. AI-assisted identification tools. Training resources from conservation organizations. Community protocols for camera trap studies. Best practices documentation from Indigenous-led programs.
CoMapeo: Free and easy-to-use tools for territory monitoring and mapping
Indigenous Guardians Toolkit: A Guide to Using Wildlife Cameras for Ecological Monitoring in a Community-based Context - Magnetawan First Nation, webinar on how to use the toolkit
Amazon Indigenous communities (Brazil, Peru, Ecuador), Wildlife Conservation Society Indigenous partnerships, Panthera Indigenous ranger programs, various Indigenous Protected Areas globally
Communities control research questions and camera placement. Traditional rackers’ knowledge essential for effective placement, expertise requires recognition and compensation. Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) regarding photographing animals, considering cultural restrictions on imaging certain species. Some animals may have spiritual significance requiring protocols. Data ownership community-controlled. Caution sharing location data (poaching risk). Communities control image sharing decisions. Complements but shouldn't replace Traditional Knowledge transmission through direct tracking.
To understand more about Traditional Knowledge monitoring protocols, please refer to COMET's Practitioners Guide to Engaging with Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Conservation Monitoring.
